Quote:
Originally Posted by Elle  I could be wrong but it appears that it a typo. It doesn't make sense to say that followed by the rest of the things noted. Lets not get carried away by words. She's not new. She's always had a good reputation. As I said just yesterday most reputable breeders don't have websites. Who has time? This is one good reason.
Health testing is not required for membership. People need to do their homework. |
No health testing is not a requirement, but it is in the code of ethics and conduct which are guidelines for us to follow.
That being said, testing your breeding stock, as it should be, doesn't guarantee your dogs won't throw pups with life-threatening genetic issues. What is as important will the breeder stand behind her guarantee, will she be there for the rest of the pups life. What the YTCA will do if such a situation arise is put pressure on the breeder to make it right. If a breeder doesn't make it right, she will be reprimanded and more than likely be removed from the roster.
And you're right, people do your homework.......I know my mentor never placed a puppy with me with a contract. The deal was always sealed with a kiss on the cheek and a hug....and the words "We'll see"......But, I know, by her reputation, her word was gold. If anything should ever arise, she'd make it right.....either by refunding your money, or taking care of the vet bills....