Quote:
Originally Posted by puppylove11  In my opinion it is unethical. There are many show exhibitors and handlers who enhance coat color to win. Along with covering up other flaws to win. We have actually seen conformation judges smell a coat in the ring to check for the odor of coloring, but they have ways of covering up the smell of the coloring as well.
When the standard for the yorkshire terrier was changed as far as coat color it made it a little more difficult for show exhibitors. Dogs were being DQ because of being a little to light or to dark in color.
In a perfect world we could all agree to disagree without the issue of bashing, but this is not a perfect world. If this was a perfect world exhibitors would not have to enhance color and try to cover up other flaws in their dogs to win a championship. |
in a perfect world all would totally breed correctly and not have puppymills and byb's...
what is your fascitation with enhancing the coat and coloring the coat? It's not like it's being bred that way like the parti, chocolate and so called teacup and babydolls? It's not determintal to the breed like breeding liver shunt, LP, leg prethesis, bad top lines, crippled rears ect....sounds like you know alot about coloring a coat LOL...are you disgruntadled for some reason with the yorkie standard? Were you beat in the show ring by someone you thought had colored a dog? You sound very hostile towards show exhibitors in general...and you are new to the form and have shown no respect so far to anyone except those that agree with you.