Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  The example I posted was just that, an example, my point is that I never see anyone suggesting that the parti puppy should be evaluated before it's bred, I read lots of threads here, we seem to have lots of parti breeders, and I have never once read a thread where this is suggested. You are teaching the non-breeders as well as the breeders when you suggest these types of things. Just this past week we had another member have a litter and her mating dogs were the result of a "whoops" pregnancy by another breeder. I would think very seldom a whoops pregnancy would result in a dog suitable for breeding. If you want people to see that you are breeding for the right reasons, you have to stick your neck out there and "admonish" poor breeding practices, not just those of us who are against it. If I'm wrong about this, and any of you parti breeders do suggest better ways to breed than you must have some links to those threads. I would like to be able to tell the difference between a good parti breeder and a bad one. |
Come on! Do you not think your reputable show friends do not have some oops breedings? Have you not noticed all the yorkshire terriers for sale and many of those breeders have poor breeding practices. Maybe if you actually took the time to look you would be able to tell the difference between a good or bad parti breeder. Instead you spend your time chasing down their threads to bash them. Do you really want to know the difference between a good and bad parti breeder? Honestly I doubt it.
I do understand your love for the yorkshire terrier breed Nancy. But I do not understand why you all feel the need to pick on some reputable honest breeders who actually love their dogs and take wonderful care of them. When you can all actually prove every member of the YTCA follows all the guidelines set by the club, you can pick on others.