Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  The example I posted was just that, an example, my point is that I never see anyone suggesting that the parti puppy should be evaluated before it's bred, I read lots of threads here, we seem to have lots of parti breeders, and I have never once read a thread where this is suggested. You are teaching the non-breeders as well as the breeders when you suggest these types of things. Just this past week we had another member have a litter and her mating dogs were the result of a "whoops" pregnancy by another breeder. I would think very seldom a whoops pregnancy would result in a dog suitable for breeding. If you want people to see that you are breeding for the right reasons, you have to stick your neck out there and "admonish" poor breeding practices, not just those of us who are against it. If I'm wrong about this, and any of you parti breeders do suggest better ways to breed than you must have some links to those threads. I would like to be able to tell the difference between a good parti breeder and a bad one. |
In all honesty have anyone of you bothered to ask what some of the parti breeders protocol is for their breeding stock? NO! Instead you all band together in bashing them.
I will tell you this. I do know of some parti breeders who have a protocol for their breeding program and I know of many so-called show breeders (even some YTCA members) who do not have a protocol for testing.
I would like my previous questions answered about enhancing coat color.
I think you should spend some of your time along with some others policing the YTCA members to make sure they adhere to the standard.
Plain and simple the AKC does recognize the parti yorkie. If the AKC did not recognize the parti yorkie many of them would not be AKC registered.