Quote:
Originally Posted by Breezeaway  It does not matter whether the pup is a parti color or a black and tan or purple for that matter. It is a yorkshire terrier and and has nothing to do with being a one trait breeder, we think we don't have berate them in public. PM's get better responses instead of trying to continuously humiliate and embarrass them in a public forum. For another thing , maybe she is just joking, do you know that she is not? Do you know anything about how she is getting the pup or anything about the so called sale?? I wouldn't think so, Until you have facts it really isn't necessary to beat up on these people. She doesn't even have the pup yet, anything could happen between now and it being a year old.
And lastly we the parti breeders,Strike that, I cant speak for others, but I don't have to say anything, you guys do enough of that for everyone that has a yorkshire terrier. |
The example I posted was just that, an example, my point is that I never see anyone suggesting that the parti puppy should be evaluated before it's bred, I read lots of threads here, we seem to have lots of parti breeders, and I have never once read a thread where this is suggested. You are teaching the non-breeders as well as the breeders when you suggest these types of things. Just this past week we had another member have a litter and her mating dogs were the result of a "whoops" pregnancy by another breeder. I would think very seldom a whoops pregnancy would result in a dog suitable for breeding. If you want people to see that you are breeding for the right reasons, you have to stick your neck out there and "admonish" poor breeding practices, not just those of us who are against it. If I'm wrong about this, and any of you parti breeders do suggest better ways to breed than you must have some links to those threads. I would like to be able to tell the difference between a good parti breeder and a bad one.