Quote:
Originally Posted by Wylie's Mom  No, the article states "the women, who acted on their OWN..." - it then says that PETA released a statement saying they "supported" what the women did.
I'm a member of PETA - that does not mean if I go somewhere and do this or that in support of animals, and then later PETA says "we support what Ann did" - that PETA PLANNED that event...do you not see that?
To use your logic in an analogy then, I'm going to assume that Yelena is a YTCA member - and that the inappropriate photo she posted here the other day from the Westminster show was also of a YTCA member (I mean, I have no real proof, so?) - so looks to me like the YTCA supported this kind of "event". If you are going to make assumptions about members of organizations, I guess the same luxury should be afforded me then and you would be okay with that?
And like I said earlier, I AM okay w/ PETA or any other group of Americans protesting events - within the LAW. These women acted on their own. That said, PETA (or any group) has a right to come out and state "I support these women's messages". |
Did the YTCA come out and say they supported this picture you speak of, like PETA did of this lady? I am not aware of the photo you are talking about.... But to me, anyone that wants to "claim" they acted on their own, only to have the organization come out and offer their support really is one of the same. PETA has used this same strategy over and over so much so, that any person or group wanting to protest would assume they would get the support from PETA should controversary arise, which it usually does, and supprisingly, PETA comes out to offer a statement of support.