Quote:
Originally Posted by jencar98  If I thought PETA's true agenda was to spay/neuter pets this ad wouldn't offend me so much. But when, PETA is responsible for euthanizing more pets than placing of pets, I can not support them. Would PETA have approved if Mrs. Duggar had 19 abortions, after all they do seem to support the destruction of life more so than the preservation of it. PETA Kills Animals | PetaKillsAnimals.com |
To summarize:
*PETA euthanized ~21,000 animals in
10 years
*To compare, my county alone, Maricopa county euthanized ~530,000 animals in 10 years
*Both organizations follow the
Asilomar Accords, which defines how to decide which animals should be euth. or not
HERE and
HERE are some examples of pictures of the animals PETA euthanized (WARNING, graphic).
So, using
your logic - are you saying that I/we should boycott (not support) our local Humane Associations and their spay neuter programs bc, for example, my local association KILLS ANIMALS - in fact, 53,000 annually?
Bc really, I honestly have never understood this line of thinking (this particular PETA argument).
Are you also saying that these animals (the ones I linked to) should have been forced to stay alive and suffer? That it was cruel to end their suffering?