[Lisa and Pic]

Originally Posted by jp4m2

Thanks Cindy......For the life of me I just don't understand why a lot of breeders don't do more research on vaccines and the effects it has on a pets immune system. The pup should be started out in life with the healthiest immune system possible. Yet it can be terribly comprimised by the overload of vaccines it has recieved before the pet owner has even taken the pet home.......

There was a study done at Perdue (just one of many done ) concerning vaccines that clearly showed the damage vaccines can do to pets. These effects can be far reaching but they will/may never be connected to the vaccines. Such as hypothyroidism, allergies, cancer, liver, kidney problems, seizures, etc.etc.etc.

This was the findings by Canine Health Concern......

There were over 4,000 dogs in the survey. We asked, if your dog is ill, when did he become ill in relation to the vaccine? We have been astounded by the results so far.

* 91% of Ataxia cases occurred within three months of a vaccine event
* 81% of dogs who had tumours at their vaccine sites, first developed the tumours within three months of being vaccinated
* 78.6% of dogs with encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) first developed the condition within three months of being vaccinated
* 73.1% of epileptic dogs first became epileptic within three months of being vaccinated
* 65.9% of dogs with colitis developed the condition within that first three months
* 64.9% of dogs with behavioural problems started to be a problem within three months of vaccination
* 61.5% of dogs developed liver failure within three months of being vaccinated.

The above figures were chosen at random from our findings to illustrate the principle to you: vaccines may be protecting our dogs against viral disease, but they are doing this at a very high price. If vaccination had no bearing on subsequent illness, only 25% of dogs should become ill in each three-month period.


Would anyone connect these illness to the vaccines they've had done? .....It's doubtful they would....

Boosters are another huge contributor for our pets health decline......They are not needed, they do more harm than good. But how many times do people take their pet in for them......With the approval of the vet I might ad.......I would consider this malpractice.......

"What are the ethical and legal implications if vets continue to insist their clients unnecessarily revaccinate their dogs annually or triennially with core MLV vaccines? These recommendations are not evidence-based. It is not ethical practice to urge clients to have medical interventions for their pets that are not needed and which may cause harm – Ronald Schultz calls this “an unacceptable medical procedure”.

Thanks for the information! Wonderful post.