View Single Post
Old 09-27-2009, 09:08 AM   #43
fannie
Donating YT 1000 Club Member
 
fannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar's Mom View Post
But, the breeder that sold on limited probably has no record that the pups went on limited. BECAUSE, it has only been the past year or so that AKC has made us return the litter registration showing names, addresses and if it was limited or unlimited. She 'could" look on her records if she knew anything was going on but no doubt would not find out that someone registered her puppies in CKC and tossed the AKC. Now, the way it is set up is that AKC CAN pull the record of that dog and see if it was sold on limited or not. They would not have been able to do that a year or so ago. it would have only been the breeders word.
I had my AKC inspection a few months ago. I asked him about the Litter Records and if we needed to be faxing those in. He said no. Maybe it's because I keep all of my records online and they already have the info though.

Also, you have to keep in mind that AKC only cares about the dogs. Regardless of wether we state full or limited, if there are puppies born and they are eligible for AKC they will register them because they are in fact, AKC.
__________________
Steph, Mama to 6 skin babies and beautiful yorkies!
fannie is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!