Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinehaven  I am just now seeing the new posts on this thread; a few posts have been deleted so I don't know what I've missed but the golden parti boy that Jeanie is advertising for 4500.00 is from another litter where both the sire and dam are AKC registered. This thread is about another litter that Jeanie has and she's selling the pups without AKC papers because the dams AKC paperwork isn't in hand yet. So in response to your statement "I believe in protecting people here on YT if i really see something happening that is wrong" - there is nothing wrong happening here, the pups in question are from 2 different litters. Maybe it would be wise to get your facts straight before pubically making false accusations of someone's wrong doing?
In regards to the YTCA link posted about off colors in the breed, this is a Breed Registry, and not a coat color registry. If a breed registry wants to have standards that are strictly adhered to for showing, that's fine, but if off colors are being produce in our registered dogs (and they have been since the beginning of the breed and in some very well known and hhighly regarded breeding programs), they should have the same right to their heritage, as their blue and tan siblings have. The link that was posted is full of mis information and in my opinion, scare tacticts. With the exception of blue born yorkies, other off colored yorkies are no more prone to health problems than traditional colored yorkies. |
Sue, I appreciate your input but if you read my post again you will see that I said "Aren't you the same person that has a Parti for sale at $4500 and listing it as AKC" I wanted people to know what was happening on another thread. I imagine you are a Parti breeder and whatever your beliefs are about color or other things mentioned, does not make this $4500 parti accepted by the AKC.