Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  Sorry for the misstatement. I assume the line you are referring to is the Nikko (sp?) line that I have seen mentioned before? Would that mean then that any dog being presented as a Parti Yorkie that did NOT have this line in their bloodline is not, in fact, a Parti Yorkie?
Sorry for offending you with my description--I guess the correct way to state it would have been "just like a standard Yorkie, except for the color" or "following the standard set for the YT with the exception of color." (Meaning that color aside, all other aspects--ear set, tail, weight, bite, etc etc would be identical to the standard currently set for the YT.) I guess the mistake was mine in assuming that what I meant would be understood. |
You didn't offend me. Someone asked the difference of a Biewer and a parti and you stated something that was not completely correct about the parti. Not sure where in my post, you felt that I was "offended".
Your question of, "Would that mean then that any dog being presented as a Parti Yorkie that did NOT have this line in their bloodline is not, in fact, a Parti Yorkie?"....is kind of out there, don't you think?? You know, as well as I do, that there are carriers that produce partis. You stated, and made it sound like a fact, that there is no known line that the parti originated from....not true. Why you then take it and ask what you did is odd.
And you saying that your mistake was assuming what you meant would be understood....I did understand what you were trying to say, Misty...it's what you always say about the parti. A person doesn't have to be able to read between the lines when you have repeatedly written the same things, just different threads.
You can keep writing to me, but you'll get no response....I do not own a Biewer so I will step out of this thread.