Quote:
Originally Posted by hugz4all4  I still wouldnt take the chance of feeding it to any of my animals...the bottom line is that cats either died or ended up seriously ill from the food...take it as you wish.. feed what you want..  |
I wasn't making a food recommendation in my Post #8 - I was trying to respond to the links which you posted. I don't feed kibble, but I do try to understand what's happening in the kibble industry, if I can (which is never easy
).
I saw the situation as this, using an analogy:
--Let's say I imported a bag of apples from Australia from Company A
--They arrived intact and in the form intended by Company A
--The US gov't tells me I can't distribute the apples unless I put this toxin on them first
--I put the toxin on my apples
--I distribute those apples, not telling anyone what I added to the apples
--Illness and deaths occur
So is it my fault, or Company A's fault? I guess it's a little of both -- it's
definitely my fault, for the most part. But the missing link, which is tragic, is that Company A didn't (or wasn't able to, once exported) follow their product through to the point where it was publicly distributed.
I'm just trying to understand what happened...and I might have it *all* wrong. I'm just not sure the fault really lies w/ Orijen here...that's what I'm trying to understand, that's all.
I was only trying to interpret the links you posted. How did you interpret the 113 pages of documents?
Did anyone else understand the issue bc it's confusing...maybe it's just me...
I do appreciate you posting these links, btw. Staying informed is so important.