Quote:
Originally Posted by jplovesjessy  ...YOU dear poster have NO clue as to what you are talking about. ... (please be computer literate and zoom in) ... Also the "slander" words ummmm.... ARE being spoken on YT.. did you see that??? How in the world are you bashing someone you don't know??? Just curious ? Do you base your opinion on one persons comments. Give me a break!! I saw Emma before when my pup wasn't even born yet, as I looked at her first litter. ... Do your stinkin research. ... Man I only come on here to get info on my baby since Christin referred me to this site, but all the ridiculous judemental people make me just want to buy a stinkin book. Let me tell you a thing or two I will go up against this lady claiming Emma is not Emma because I have seen her in person and I know for a fACT that is the same dog. Can any of you say that?? ?I don't think so. You also know a buyer is responsible for SHipping PERIOD.! Christin if you read this. I have your back and I will be your eye witness. |
OMG where do I start? Why are you writing so hatefully? We can disagree without the vile turpitude. If there is something specific you disagree with, state it plainly without all of the meanness. The OP asked for opinions, I gave mine. I think the OP proved some of her points (for instance, pulling up the digital picture data showing the picture to be 5 months old vice 1). I would not say the dog is definately not the same dog. I did say that looking at the pictures I would not believe they were. I also think there were enough other things wrong with the transaction that it needs refunding. I stated specific reasons in my post that made me feel the way I do. I did not call the seller names, I did not try to insinuate she was stupid, so why are you doing that? I am not bashing her, I do feel she has acted unprofessionally -- my opinion, and obviously one shared by others. In turn, she has those like you who believe differently. That is life -- everyone is not going to agree all the time. But hopefully, people will be mature enough not to act like schoolyard hooligans when they state their respective stands. You would make a lot more points with people if you would nicely say that you have always had rewarding and professional dealings with her.
Support your case instead of
attacking the other side. We're not in politics for heaven's sake!
To address some of your points: I do certainly have a clue. I am computer literate albeit not nearly as much as I would like. I don't know about you, but here on YT, I type my words and do not "speak" them, which would make it libel and not slander IF (BIG IF) there were untruthful written words, just as I said -- although this is such a minor point I hate to repeat it. No, I do not base my opinion on one person's comments. I read what BOTH the seller and buyer had to say. I looked at what proof was offered by each, I made as informed a decision as was possible. No matter how many times you saw the dog before, while it was at the sellers house, you cannot absolutely KNOW that it is the dog that is now in the buyer's possession either, unless you accompanied it there. We both just have to have our own opinions. They can be different. What a drab and lifeless world this would be if we didn't sometimes disagree.
As your request that I do my "stinking research, these are some of the things I noticed:
--The seller tries to make things look bad for the buyer like acting like she is concealing her identity just because she used both her first and middle names -- and told the seller which was which.
--The seller accuses her of keeping the dog outside, like she is making her live out there in the very same post that she quotes from an email where the buyer is telling her, in NO WAY is the dog living outside. She was outside WITH the dog so her poor little 3 pound dog could eat. The seller is obviously trying to garner support by making people think the buyer is abusing Emma when she knows she is NOT being made to live outside.
--You say she never said the dog would be a breeder, yet the ad says "she will make beautiful puppies" -- that is breeding. No way this dog should have been sold as a potential breeder.
--The seller is offering only $800 back to the buyer if she pays even more money to return the dog. The buyer has already paid $1150 to the seller and more in vet fees. The seller should pay for at least one of the shipping fees.
-- You say there is no way Emma ever displayed agression when you saw her so many times but Jasmanea herself wrote: "You were well aware of the "aggression" and you ASSURED me many times over that you knew "click training, behavioral training, etc.. " So, she is admitting there is an agression problem.
-- You said the buyer is responsible for shipping period. That is not true when there has been misrepresentation.
-- and so many other things that I already wrote in my previous post. So, you are right about one thing --it was some STINKIN' research.
We should just agree to disagree. But if you want to do it in another post, please just leave out the hostility. Thanks in advance.