Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiekist  I am trying to think what kind of vet records will be required and how that will eventually help the buyer. Would only a shot record given by a veterinarian be the protocal making it so that the breeder could not give their own shots? Or would the protocal be more intensive? |
Good point. Further, would it be required to follow the vet's protocol and begin shots too early for some breeds, as many vets do now? Would a breeder have to allow 7 in 1 shots? Also, the 15 day warranty is worrisome. As the bill reads, the buyer would only need a statement from their vet saying the puppy was sick or had a genetic defect. A second opinion should be automatic in these cases. While I (or most breeders) would not try to get out of our responsibility, there are some jack-ass vets that I wouldn't trust if they said the sun was up. Many things can happen to a pup that is out of the breeder's control, whether by injury or careless exposure to disease on the part of the new owner.