View Single Post
Old 03-04-2009, 12:51 PM   #87
yorkiekist
YT 3000 Club Member
 
yorkiekist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HOT, HOT, HOT AZ
Posts: 3,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcard View Post
Argh, I do need to get some work done. Drat YT sometimes lol. My problems are with the concept of using limit laws and breeder licensing because they don't address the root issue-- are the dogs being neglected or abused? I have no skin kids. My dogs are my kids. But my feelings about my dogs don't apply to everyone. I think unless a dog is being harmed due to mistreatment or neglect, it really is not the government's business to say you can only have "x" number of intact dogs or you can only breed a bitch every other cycle, etc.

I do have fears that what is happening 20 miles from my house in Illinois will happen here in 10 years if we open the door to limits and management of breeding practices by our state government. I think our goal should be legislation that is focused on whether or not an animal is being harmed.

Also, I have very strict opinions on what is ethically or morally correct when breeding dogs. But I also don't know that my beliefs on these issues should equate to should be legal vs illegal.
We need you and your common sense approach in every state!!! You have explained these bills wonderfully and definately much better than I can. The bills should be about animal cruelty and there are already laws against this in probably every state.
__________________
BUYCOTT ARIZONA
yorkiekist is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!