Quote:
Originally Posted by MyFairLacy  I'm pretty positive I'm going to set up a phone consult with Susan Davis, a holistic nutritionist in California. I'd like to see what she has to say about Rylie's diet as well. It's just so confusing..you try to do what's best, but it's hard to know what really is best. I guess it's no different than people...one year they say something is great for you and another year they say to stay away from it. She's been eating the homecooked diet I made for her well, but I really want to consult a nutritionist just to make sure we're feeding the best diet we can. |
That's exactly right, and that's why it best not to be swayed by what I call "pop" science. One study never means anything in the real world of science. It just indicates further study is needed. Very often an original study can never be replicated, and this indicates the original study was in error, and the results were due to some fluke. Yet, whole books and theories are written in pop science because of the one poorly done study. After a study is replicated, it has to be manipulated to see if other things could have caused the effect. Scientists are like detectives solving a mystery, and are always looking to see what could have caused the effect besides what was being tested, and design another study to rule out that variable. So that's why that laymen often think that science is rapidly changing, but it's not, true science moves slowly, as it should.