Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiekist  I am not for mills at all. I am glad they are all getting busted one by one. I am against badly written legislation, harrassment, intimidation, etc, against ligitimate businesses, the dog, cat, horse fanciers that continually are the target of peta, hsus, and even the pompom girls. I think there has been good exposure on Oprah and things are getting done. I think that this is a good way of expressing ones point about the mills instead of going to dog shows and letting dogs out of their crates, poisoning dogs at dog shows, walking around in KKK garb or pompom harrassment in front of legal businesses.
I just posted the bill against these annoying people and that businesses/dog shows/rodeos/circuses, etc do not have to put up with them. I dont like my Constitutional rights trampled on and I am sure you dont either. Maybe someday it will be illegal of own a pet store. But the way I see legislation being written, it also may be illegal to own pets in the future also. I hope you can see my point of view. |
I could see your point if those dogs were from a legitimate dog breeder, but puppy mills are certainly not "dog fanciers". They are dog
abusers. There is a complete difference and I don't see how YOUR rights are being trampled on. No one is hurting you. These girls weren't causing those animals any harm, they weren't letting them out of cages, or anything but those puppy millers ARE harming those animals... those girls were informing the public of where those dogs come from to do their part in shutting those mills down.