Quote:
Originally Posted by Lolapup  I'm not a taxpayer anymore. I'm a taker and couldn't agree with you more. I actually got sick to my stomach reading this thread. She CHOSE to have those babies without a care of how they would be taken care of. Yet my son, who so desperately needs the help is getting cut.
All we can do is hope and pray CPS steps in. Not just for the 8, but all 14 
BTW...kudos to your friends. They have their hearts and priorities where they need to be. Just my opinion of course........... |
From a cost stance honestly it's way better for everyone including the tax payers if your at home with your son in this case. The cost of all the round the clock care and attention your son would need if you were working definitely would cost way more than the small check your getting.
I want to see what she will do when her money gets cut even further as the economy is in such a state. I think in her case and the case of folks trying that stupidity to get over they should get a max amount. If you choose to keep having children then your kind of a$$ out because you will only be given so much help. It's a hard line because while we despise her stupidity and selfishness we wouldn't want to see the babies without and hungry.
Part of her greed is not going to get her anywhere. I was reading that usually by the time they deliver and word gets out companies will jump on the bandwagon for the free publicity. She is getting no such offers from the diaper companies or the baby food companies or even stores. Everyone is pinching pennies and they said they think many companies don't want to be associated with her because of the public outcry about the situation.