[LilMissy]

This is just something I've been turning over in my head... so if it seems random, just don't mind me

So the more I read the more that theory seems to hold as legitimate. Why is that the smaller the baby, the "better" they're considered? Or perhaps not even better, but worth a higher price tag? I'm telling myself it's just a trend (that leads to the whole teacup craze) and there isn't anything better about them... kind of like society's manipulation that the thinner you are, the more beautiful....

I would think the standard of the "picture-perfect" (4-7 lbs) would call for the higher prices , and because it tends to be the smaller babies that have more difficulties it'd only make more sense to me that the pricing would be the other way around...

Am I just completely missing something right now?

Very interesting thought. When I first started looking for my Yorkie, I had picked out a litter of puppies to go and view that came from a very large Yorkie Mom and Dad. Their puppies were priced at $1450. Then I saw Missy's picture and totally fell in love with her. Her parents are both tiny, and Missy cost me $995. So the smaller pups aren't always the most expensive. Maybe my experience isn't the norm? BTW, I picked Missy because to me she was the cutest, it had nothing to do with size