This is just something I've been turning over in my head... so if it seems random, just don't mind me
So the more I read the more that theory seems to hold as legitimate. Why is that the smaller the baby, the "better" they're considered? Or perhaps not even better, but worth a higher price tag? I'm telling myself it's just a trend (that leads to the whole teacup craze) and there isn't anything better about them... kind of like society's manipulation that the thinner you are, the more beautiful....
I would think the AKC standard of the "picture-perfect" Yorkie (4-7 lbs) would call for the higher prices
, and because it tends to be the smaller babies that have more difficulties it'd only make more sense to me that the pricing would be the other way around...
Am I just completely missing something right now?
