Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  Interesting point. It makes me wonder what the answer to this question would have been before the Wisdom panel existed....hmmm...
So then they state the results are not 100% accurate or that they are not designed for purebreds, not because that is actually the case, but ONLY because they are afraid of being involved in a law suits?  Riiiight.... 
Well then it seems the confusion over the situation is clear. It's not a matter of fact, it's a matter of how everyone chooses to interpret the facts they are given. You have clearly chosen to interpret them as you see fit and others have done the same. That being the case, why is it so darn hard to state what you believe, allow others to do the same, and then leave it open for anyone interested to take what they can from the responses and make their own conclusion. Why does is always result in a challenge to prove knowledge or creditials? Is it really neccesarry for others to belittle anyone that has a different opinion on the matter? Sadly THAT is what has driven many away from becoming more educated on Biewers.  Many want to learn, but heaven forbid they should ask or question anything. They'd meet less resistance if they tried to murder the Pope!
That is why again, I urge anyone interested in this particular aspect/theory/fact/argument to contact the company directly themselves and draw their conclusions from that. The company itself is going to be able to give the most accurate and unbiased information--somthing that will most likely never be possible here. |
Well you pretty much covered it all. I would just add one more question. If the test is inconclusive, what good is it. I think we need to wait a while until they themselves are more confident in their test reslts before we put much faith in them.