View Single Post
Old 01-20-2009, 12:49 PM   #30
yorkiekist
YT 3000 Club Member
 
yorkiekist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HOT, HOT, HOT AZ
Posts: 3,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hugz4all4 View Post
that was a great article, very informative. However why does the pictures that pinehaven posted clearly shows that some of the breeds that were mixed to create the yorkie were parti colored?? Is that picture wrong?

Just so you all know.. Im just trying to understand what the big deal is myself. AKC registers these pups so there had to be some proof that these dogs were pure yorkies right? I honestly dont care either way, mixes or purebred.. as most of you know all ready Im a "mutt" fan and they are beautiful dogs.
The "big deal" is that if you keep trying to change the parent breed standard, the breed will no longer look like the breed anymore. Reputable breeders breed to the breed standard and not to the latest popular fault being purposely breed most likely for the $$$$. The parti/off color breeders are doing just this all the while spouting their version of the history of the breed and basically telling you that the parent club(YTCA) is full of sh*t. Lets say that drop ears are now the big popular rage. You will then get irresponsible breeders breeding for that fault as well. Popularity=$$$. Simple economics.I guess you have to be a breed fancier to completely understand it. I am not saying you arent and I hope I explained this ok.
__________________
BUYCOTT ARIZONA
yorkiekist is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!