Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiekist  What would you know about anything being outdated?? Its only "out-dated" if it doesnt agree with you and sues agenda. I believe that the YTCA has done more research than you will ever know about. YTCA also does not dictate to anyone about life and death of any puppy. Its up to the breeder if they want to cull the pups or not. Most reputable breeders that have a faulty puppy will place it in a pet home only, not to be bred.
And I am sure that you have written public undeniable proof that the old time breeders had partis. Records are easy enough to skrew up now and I bet even easier way back in the dark ages.
And by the way, ALOT or Yorkie bloodlines go back eventually to Pomp n Circumstance so that must mean, according to your theory, that most Yorkies carry the parti gene. |
Yes I guess that would.
Their information is outdated because the AKC has given written proof that the parti gene did go back to those lines. they got that information right from the horses mouth.
The YTCA site does not give any of this information. They also do not explain how Champion yorkies have produced parti colored off spring.
In one sentence they deny the existence of the parti yorkies, and in another sentence they disqualify the color. Why do they need to disqualify the color if it is not even part of the yorkie makeup?
I feel the people asking questions about the parti colored yorkies deserve to get all of the information that is out there on the subject. One should not stop with just one website.
When you look at all of the information, a preponderance of the evidence shows that it is more likely than not, that the parti gene was part of the original make up of the yorkshire terrier.