View Single Post
Old 01-19-2009, 08:39 PM   #14
amandawash
Lovin' my R & R
Donating Member
 
amandawash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 2,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie May View Post
It just gets sooooo confusing because while sevo is said to be the safest (especially for the hear), aren't there less blood sugar issues with Iso or a lower seizure rate? Isn't it best for liver issues?

I know premedication is usually done with an injectable (subq or IV) but there are reports of being masked down with Iso for liver compromised dogs being better.

Now there are references to Iso being just as safe and way more common than Sevo. So who can you believe? I just give this one to the vet and she can do whatever she wants but it is frustrating.

Jeanietoo, I think a tech monitors during anesthesia. Preop blood work is done. An IV is placed. Surgery is done on a heated surface, pulse oximetry is used, etc. Not sure Ellie has ever had an EKG though. Although I bet the vet does heart monitoring continually during surgery. She doesn't cut corners at all.
It's really hard and frustrating to even think about.

According to hubby- sevo is a cousin to iso. It is a newer dirivative of iso and supposed to be "the thing" to use now days. It is supposed to be easier on the body (at least that's how the drug companies market it to vets and there is a lot of research done on it) and it is true that masking them down is much easier on the liver. I guess the risk of intubation troubles is much less than the harm the pre-anesthetic can do to the liver. They have special cat boxes they use to mask ferral cats and unruly dogs, but the vets and techs have to be extremely careful upon opening the box because of the sevo inside.

I think you know and trust your vet like I do so I do just that- leave it up to them. I guess if I didn't have that type of relationship and I had an extremely liver-compromised dog I would really insist that they mask them down.

I copied this info from a pharmacology drug book. Granted this is from a human pharmacology drug book but it is a good review of the drug:

Sevoflurane is an ether inhalation general anaesthetic agent with lower solubility in blood than isoflurane or halothane but not desflurane. The low solubility and the absence of pungency facilitate rapid mask induction; the low blood solubility also expedites "wash-out' and therefore recovery from anaesthesia. Sevoflurane produces dose-dependent CNS, cardiovascular and respiratory depressant effects that generally parallel those of isoflurane. Sevoflurane is degraded by carbon dioxide absorbents to nephrontoxic (in rats) haloalkenes, although renal toxicity has not been observed in humans. Compared with other inhalation anaesthetics, negligible quantities of carbon monoxide are generated from degradation of sevoflurane by carbon dioxide absorbents. Sevoflurane has negligible airway irritant effects, which facilitates a "smooth' induction, even in comparison with halothane in paediatric patients, and makes sevoflurane especially amenable to rapid induction of anaesthesia in adults and children. Emergence, orientation an postoperative cognitive and psychomotor function recovery of paediatric outpatients is singnificantly more rapid from sevoflurane than from halothane anaesthesia. In adult inpatients and outpatients, emergence and orientation are significantly faster after sevoflurane than after isoflurane but not desflurane anaesthesia. Other recovery parameters (e.g. times to sitting, ambulation) occur at similar times after either sevoflurane or desflurane anaesthesia. Recovery of psychomotor function occurs at generally similar times after sevoflurane, isoflurane or desflurane. Compared with propofol, sevoflurane facilitates more predictable extubation times and significantly better postoperative modified Aldrete scores in outpatients, although cognitive and psychomotor recovery occurs at similar times for both agents. As a supplement to opioid anaesthesia during coronary bypass graft surgery or in those at risk for myocardial ischaemia, sevoflurane is comparable to isoflurane. Limited data suggest that it is also as useful as isoflurane for the maintenance of anaesthesia during neurosurgical or obstetric procedures. Sevoflurane is well tolerated by adult and paediatric patients during induction of anaesthesia, with a low incidence of mild airway complications (breath-holding, coughing, excitement and laryngospasm). During rapid induction, it is particularly better tolerated than isoflurane or halothane. Sevoflurane has a lower potential for hepatic injury than halothane. Unlike methoxyflurane, sevoflurane undergoes minimal intrarenal defluorination, which may account for the lack of fluoride ion-induced nephrotoxicity in humans, despite elevated plasma fluoride levels after its use. In summary, sevoflurane provides for a rapid and smooth induction of, and recovery from, anaesthesia. These features combined with its favourable cardiovascular profile should make sevoflurane the agent of choice for inhalation induction in adult and paediatric anaesthesia. Although further clinical evaluation will define the role of this agent relative to that of propofol and desflurane, sevoflurane should also prove to be a valuable alternative anaesthetic agent for adults in both outpatient and inpatient surgery.

There are some great peer-reviewed articles about sevo/iso at this link here:

PubMed Home

I am sure you know about PubMed but if not it's a wonderful source of peer-reviewed information for both veterinary and human medicine. You can't access the complete study but the overviews are fantastic and easy to follow.
__________________
Amanda 's Ranger & Ryder
amandawash is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!