Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  Because otherwise, what are you trying to achieve by breeding them if there isn't any goal "type" that you are trying to match. I really think you are missing the point...or just trying to change the subject and make a different point altogether. No one is claiming that Partis are the only non-standard dogs being produced or bred. Just that you can't breed a dog to a standard when a standard for the dog doesn't exists. To state such, as was done earlier, is misleading to those who are uninformed. The rest is really irrelevant as far as that fact is concerned.
Wow, I didn't know that the YTCA was adamately promoting and calling for the death of those dogs that don't meet the standard.  I repeatedly see that "breeders were forced to cull these dogs" and I'm just curious as to who exactly forced them and why that seems to be a brought up as if it serves as some sort of justification for the practice.
Also, you state that "we do have a standard set for the parti". So my question is, "who" exactly is "we", when did this set standard come about and which official organization or registry has adopted it. In short, show me where is has been recognized as an official standard. |
My statement was "which colors live and which colors die" it said nothing about calling for the death of those dogs. it was carefully worded so as not to be twisted.
When you want to start a new breed club, you do not go directly to the AKC and say hey we just started a new breed club let us in. You have to have a membership and records established. Rome wasn't built in a day. These things take time. We (The Official Colorful Yorks**te Terrier Club) have mistakes to make and obstacles to overcome.
We know that we may never be recognized as a separate club, and that is OK. But we do have standards set. We have adopted the same standards set by the YTCA, except that we do not limit color. All of these colors were a natural part of the Yorkshire Terrier makeup and should not be allowed to die off.