I'm staying out of this completely.. but just felt the need to clear up an misconception regarding health certs. You don't have to OWN or breed, or have the registration papers in your name, or any other tie to a dog to be the Consignee on a health certificate. A health certificate has to be in the name of the SHIPPER of a dog, if Joe Blow was taking Fido to the airport, regardless of whether Joe owned or bred Fido, or picked him up wondering on the street... he would be the one who's name needed to be on the health cert...IF HE WERE TAKING THE DOG TO THE AIRPORT TO SHIP. It does not mean he owned or bred the dog. I'm otherwise not commenting on this thread.. but I don't like when people are led to believe something that isn't true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrsygal37  [B] I just want to say that I personally have the document that Karen is talking about. It was scanned through WORD so this is why she is having trouble posting it. I am leaving for work but will try to save it as a picture and then attatch it here. Many of you know me and know that I am honest and that I work diligently in rescue and in trying to stop bad breeders. I am not sure how or why Glenda would get herself involved in any of this but I have to be honest and say that according to the document sent to me - it does show Glenda as the owner of the pups shipped and Puppy Love as the Consignee. Six dogs were shipped (one Pug and Five Yorkies all 11 weeks of age) According to the document it shows Glenda (owner of the dogs) as shipper and Puppy Love the destination and consigne. I have no vested interest in any of this and I do not know Karen or Glenda. Elaine B] |