OK, when someone makes comments directed at comments made with a big ole LOL attached, is that not making fun. So it hurt my feelings.
I NEVER said I thought i knew it all about yorkies. I have been onthe site lurking/ reading comments made by you folks , whom I consider the authorities, for about 2 yrs now. I am a very scientific person. I am obsessed with yorkies,I don't have a mentor. I only have the internet and so it seems to me that the best way to preserve/ protect the breed if I choose to have a few litters is to buy the best stock I CAN possibly get. Would any of you disagree with that statement? Isn't that what you do? you don;t get one good sire and breeds to inferior dams just to see if by a miracle you can get a great pup out of it.
And no... I tried to get my girl from NA and was shut out. I was placed on waiting lists.
I was asked for thousands of dollars and then told I could not breed . (And I wanted a small puppy, with absolutely no intention of breeding).
My point is, how can you say I will harm the breed? My intention of charging alot for a pup does in itself protect from harm.
Was embarassed that I said
Chandler didn;t look so good at
Eukanuba. oops..but see, I am not trying to break into your sport of showing. i just admire the breed for its many variables and the magic that occurs when all the variables come together to produce a truly magnificent yorkie. I have watched the video of Westminister last yr a dozen times. So beautiful and elegant.
So what is so wrong with my plan for eeking out some happiness that involves baby yorkies? I can 't see why you are expecting me to start at the bottom with some inferior stock as some kind of paying your dues thing. It is a free world and people do get what they want sometimes, even if it is not under your control.
I do apologize if I have offended but I see no other way to
obtain my goals but to circumvent NA Breeders who have closed ranks somewhat. I know you mean well, but be assured I do not intend to do anything to harm the yorkie gene pool. |