Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanieK  It is only a fault becAuse the YTCA has declared it to be one, it does not meant that there is anything wrong with the dogs. The YTCA seems to think that they are the only ones fit to determine who shoulod breed and who should not breed. these dogs are not unsound and their color is part off the original makeup of the yorkie. we are not taking anything away from the traditional colored yhorkies, we are not ruining the breed and we are not breeding unsound dogs. And i personally have never called one rare or unique. They are not common, but they will be in time.
. |
But every breed has it's own set standard right?? i mean you don't see any rotwilers(sp) being bred to have white and red markings they are bred to have black and tan markings it is what makes them distingishable from a black lab or a poodle right?
I don't have a problem with you or anyone who wants to breed the off colors i for one DO like the party look in any breed but all i was saying is it isn't the standard like stated above if you seen a red and white Rotty you wouldn't know it was a rotty.
The thing i respect about the Biewers is that they recognize that the color is not a yorkie standard although they came from yorkies they are not called yorkies they don't want to be added as a sub group to the yorkies they want their own name and standard. Why should this be different from the other colors??? if you want to breed them call them Golden Terriers, Chocolate Terriers, Purple People Eaters (LOL)
etc???