Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  No, "we" have not established anything. If you are under the impression that they "lie and mislead" then that is your right, but it is YOUR OPINION only...not a proven, established fact.
Unless one was there and part of any study they conducted, I don't see how anyone can proclaim with any certainty that any results were skewed or biased.
As for "not contacting them" for that reason or any other...that seems like a very convenient route.  |
As I said it would do me no good to contact them because they are deliberately misleading the public, therefore I wouldn't believe anything they have to say.
They have access to the same information that the rest of us do and all other avenues lead to "there is a good possibility that the maltese were in the original make up", yet they state otherwise. So if there is no proof then the least they should do is say that it is not proven rather than to state it as fact.
They also refuse to accept the research that the AKC has done. why is that?