Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanieK  The post by Lorranie, that claims they have proved that the biewers are not purebred yorkies, is not true. there is no more proof that they are not purebred than there is that they are purebred. No documentation has be shown to prove anything of the sort.
Until someone has documentation to prove that they are not purebreds, it is just someone making an unsubstantiated claim. Hell anyone of us can do that.
I can say that it is proven that yorkies are half pitt bull terriers. I can even post on some website that it has been proven. that is not proof, that would be just me making some unsubstantiated claim.
Until science progresses to the point where they can tell the breed of a dog through it's DNA there is no proof of anything. All we have to go on are the records from the Biewer and parti breeders.
That post was dismissed as being just someones opinion, and as Lorraine never came back with proof it was laid to rest, until you dug it back up and said what a good post it was. |
I would put my money on Lorraine and Pruitt before believeing any of the scenarios about parti colors that you and pinwehaven have come up with. And who dismissed her post as being an opinion, the parti breeders? Doesnt that mean that you are only spouting "opinions" also? Can blue and tan color breeders dismiss your statements, or is that only for the parti breeders? Why is it that the only records to go on are Biewer and parti breeders records? I guess that the blue and tan breeders records are all lies?
And by the way, it is a good post!