[Nancy1999]

Originally Posted by Baby Blessing

The ordinance I have posted effected ALL OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, Effective Date of Enforcement below is stated from the ordinance. IT DID PASS AND WAS MADE LAW AS EXPLAINED BEFORE. Effective March 1, 2007

AB 1634 is a State Bill. These two are not the same.
I posted about the situation in our area because it needs to be known what is happening here and it is also happening in other areas.

To date I have no idea how many other cities recently have adopted this ordinance, but as noted below made public by the county, it certainly has been more than a few cities, HOPEFULLY NO MORE. Mandatory spay/Neuter should be a matter of choice.
However, the following is cities that have adopted the same ordinance as Los Angeles County. With cities implimenting this same ordinance, maybe eventually Mr. Levine and others won't be concerned with the AB 1634 due to the rate this ordinance is being pushed through out the state of California. VERY IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO BE AWARE OF THIS ORDINANCE AND WHAT HAS AND IS HAPPENING THUS FAR.

Cities that have adopted the Spay/Neuter & Microchip Ordinance
Updated February 1, 2008

Agoura Hills - Effective Aug. 23, 2006. Enforcement in effect

Bradbury - Effective Jan. 18, 2007. Enforcement in effect

Compton - Effective Aug. 9, 2007. Enforcement in effect

Inglewood - Effective Aug. 11, 2006. Enforcement in Effect

La Habra Heights – Effective Nov. 2006 Compliance grace period until July 1, 2008

La Puente - Effective Aug. 8, 2006. Enforcement in effect

Maywood - Effective July 26, 2006. Enforcement in effectSanta Clarita -
Effective Jan.11, 2007. Enforcement in effect

San Fernando - Effective Sept. 5, 2007. Compliance grace period until April 1, 2008

Walnut - Effective August 9, 2006. Enforcement in effect


Partial Ordinance Adoption

*Culver City – Effective Oct. 24, 2006. Enforcement in effect
*License Fee Schedule not adopted
Residents not eligible to participate in Low-Cost S/N Voucher Program


*El Monte – Effective May 17, 2007. Enforcement in effect
*Mandatory Microchips and Current County License Fees adopted
*Mandatory Spay/Neuter not adopted-


I have posted all I know on this subject and what we as well as many other responsable pet owners were forced to do,
Mandatory Spay/Neuter

Patti and Jack

The problem I have with you posting the other law is that people think they are the same thing, the other law has already passed, and certain cities have adopted it, maybe those places were puppy mills were operating, I don't know. This thread should be about AB 1634 and whether or not it's a good bill. The other bill is entirely different, and I don't think many of us agree that it is a good bill, I haven't really studied it, but my point is don't believe the propaganda, read the bill see what it says, don't necessarily be against it because some people say it's mandatory spay and neuter.