View Single Post
Old 08-27-2008, 12:31 PM   #73
Baby Blessing
Our Blessings R Many
Donating Member
 
Baby Blessing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the shelter of God's Loving Care.
Posts: 3,095
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999 View Post
I'm confused this says that this ordinance became effective June 1, 2006, AB 1634 hasn't even passed yet. AB 1634 is an attempt to cut down on the dogs roaming the streets, you would have to have your dog picked up and taken to the pound three times before it would be required to be spayed or neutered, and even then there are exemptions.

It sounds like we are talking about two different bills. Maybe because only a few cities have adopted the bill you posted, the other bill is being considered. Here are the cities that have adopted the bill you cited. http://animalcare.lacounty.gov/cms1_051320.doc. I would hate to see AB 1634 confused with this bill, it just doesn't seem to be the same at all, and only addresses irresponsible pet owners who allow their dogs to roam loose. [/url]
The ordinance I have posted effected ALL OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, Effective Date of Enforcement below is stated from the ordinance. IT DID PASS AND WAS MADE LAW AS EXPLAINED BEFORE. Effective March 1, 2007

AB 1634 is a State Bill. These two are not the same.

I posted about the situation in our area because it needs to be known what is happening here and it is also happening in other areas.

To date I have no idea how many other cities recently have adopted this ordinance, but as noted below made public by the county, it certainly has been more than a few cities, HOPEFULLY NO MORE. Mandatory spay/Neuter should be a matter of choice.
However, the following is cities that have adopted the same ordinance as Los Angeles County. With cities implimenting this same ordinance, maybe eventually Mr. Levine and others won't be concerned with the AB 1634 due to the rate this ordinance is being pushed through out the state of California. VERY IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO BE AWARE OF THIS ORDINANCE AND WHAT HAS AND IS HAPPENING THUS FAR.


Cities that have adopted the Spay/Neuter & Microchip Ordinance
Updated February 1, 2008

Agoura Hills - Effective Aug. 23, 2006. Enforcement in effect

Bradbury - Effective Jan. 18, 2007. Enforcement in effect

Compton - Effective Aug. 9, 2007. Enforcement in effect

Inglewood - Effective Aug. 11, 2006. Enforcement in Effect

La Habra Heights – Effective Nov. 2006 Compliance grace period until July 1, 2008

La Puente - Effective Aug. 8, 2006. Enforcement in effect

Maywood - Effective July 26, 2006. Enforcement in effectSanta Clarita -
Effective Jan.11, 2007. Enforcement in effect

San Fernando - Effective Sept. 5, 2007. Compliance grace period until April 1, 2008

Walnut - Effective August 9, 2006. Enforcement in effect


Partial Ordinance Adoption

*Culver City – Effective Oct. 24, 2006. Enforcement in effect
*License Fee Schedule not adopted
Residents not eligible to participate in Low-Cost S/N Voucher Program


*El Monte – Effective May 17, 2007. Enforcement in effect
*Mandatory Microchips and Current County License Fees adopted
*Mandatory Spay/Neuter not adopted-


I have posted all I know on this subject and what we as well as many other responsable pet owners were forced to do,
Mandatory Spay/Neuter

Patti and Jack

Last edited by Baby Blessing; 08-27-2008 at 12:34 PM.
Baby Blessing is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!