Quote:
Originally Posted by YorkichonBella  I'm going to try to be polite so this is what I know: 
The term "mutt" generally refers to a dog of unknown descent. It was originally not viewed to be derogatory. Some use this term with no disrespect, while others....well let's just say NOT!
The term crossbreed refers to puppies produced by the breeding technique of breeding known dogs of two different purebred dog breeds for some specific reason.
There is no guarantee of good genetic health, or temperment, of any dog, purebred or otherwise, as not all damaging genes are recessive, and there are relatively few single-gene traits. Also, of course, purebred and mixed-breed dogs are equally susceptible to nongenetic ailments, such as rabies, distemper, injury, and infestation by parasites.
Some owners value a dog's pedigree as a status symbol and, therefore, have no use for mixed-breed dogs; others particularly appreciate the physical or behavioral traits of certain breeds; still others ignore pedigree and, instead, value a dog's personality and health.
Local animal shelters adopt out dogs of both purebred and mixed ancestry, emphasizing each dog's personality and suitability as a companion for each potential owner's lifestyle. |
I think this is really well put. When someone said that the potential is not only to bring out the best of both breeds but the worst also, if they are speaking of genetic traits then yes, both are possible. Anything is possible in genetics! To predict what kind of cross will be produced from a breeding is not possible. But, as others were saying, if some breeder is trying to create a new breed, they are taking on a huge responsibility to these dogs not only for their well being, but their health in general. That I truly respect. Mixed breeds of known decent, mixed breeds of unknown decent all have a chance of being beautiful dogs. I guess I just love dogs!!!
However, people who use the labels "teacup", "designer dog", or use the claim that it is "rare" to add on more $$ to a price tag, now that I don't agree with! If a person is charging the same for a mix than it is for a purebreed I don't find anything wrong with that. But if any of the marketing terms are used to create a huge profit, then I start to question the breeders intentions.
I would be willing to purchase a dog that is a cross breed for the same amount as a purebreed yorkie. As long as the breeders knows, and their conscience is at ease then why not? Vet bills are the same for a litter of pure bred yorkies than it is for a litter of mixes. Just my two cents...