Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  Once you are a "party to inhumane acts?" I'm assuming you mean Iams by that comment...? I certainly don't support unnecessary animal cruelty.
Yes, I've posted it a time or two--it is, afterall, my opinion.
Yes, I agree with Ann's post--it's important to consider the content of a dog's diet, not just feed them something because of the name on the bag. (At least that was what I was going for.) Not sure what you mean in regards to my opinion of Hill's though...  |
Yes I did mean Iams. I was referring to their animal testing that you pointed out they no longer engage in.
I was only assuming that since you agreed so enthusiastically with Ann's (very good) points, that you have changed you previous support of the company.
I agree with you, Misti, 100%. I think unfortunately, too often, people fall prey to the advertising blitz of Iams and mistake a very well know name for a quality food. It is so very important to look past the name on the bag- excellent point.
__________________
"If you have men who will exclude any of God’s creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity, you will have men who will deal likewise with their fellow men." — St. Francis of Assisi, 1181-1226