Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiesmiles   This angers me so much -- she found it more fruitful to spend her time photoshopping dogs together than actually caring for real live breathing dogs!!
If that isn't humane, I don't know what is!
I can not figure out how a judge could make such a decision! What about sticking her with the $100,000 plus bill the rescue organization has incurred?? That would have made more sense!!
It has cost her nothing over the last few months, and now she just gets the dogs back 
What confused me about her website is who are the dogs and people in the show pictures?? Was she once somewhat reputable or into showing or are these stolen pics? |
She should have to pay the $100,000!