Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkieisme  Just looked at his site, seems like there are two sides to a story. He also had a lot of dogs. He said they were worked with 24/7 but he had self feeders. All of the designer dogs shocked me. Seemed his puppies had problems a lot also since he gave discounts for the puppies to a few people. I don't understand the difference in inspections, if he failed one he should have failed the other. If those buildings are his, a lot of money was spent but he had a lot of pictures of different animals in one run. All in all I left the site feeling like they did the best thing when they took those poor animals away. Of course my husband's thoughts were, dang tax money is being used to buy this man out. My question is Why not just go in and take his animals? Why pay him? What about other puppy mills, now they will want money to be shut down. |
I don't think tax money is being used to shut him down. The Humane Society is not government (taxpayer) funded.
But even if it took government funding to shut him down, so be it. We use tax payer money to shut down drug labs, bad daycares and other unscrupulous businesses.