[jrincon17]

Originally Posted by yorkiegirl83

I agree that for that particular competiton, it probably would have been smarter to go w/o clothing because if they were at a dog show and were looking for grooming, wearing an outfit would hide what the judges could see, which I'm sure could be an issue.

I thought the dogs are not barbie dolls statement was out of line though and I'm 99% sure the owner of Lucky on the judges panel has dressed her dog before -- she used to have some show, I can't remember the name of it, but it was a relationship show and she'd always have Lucky with her in his bag and I think I remember him wearing tee shirts.

She took him into restaurants even I believe all zipped up in his bag, so I don't see where she had room to criticize someone else.

I understand the need to see the dog, not the outfit, but they could have used more tact in what they were saying.

But truth be told, I don't really like the show -- I feel they make dog owners out to be kind of crazy and nutty.

LOl have you seen some people on here, dog owners are crazy and nutty