Quote:
Originally Posted by kalina82  i think charging us to vote is simply ridiculous, especially $20. If the meet up was in VA i was definitely going to go. however now that you decided to charge us just to vote, i'm not going to participate in this next poll.
i don't know what the big deal is with everyone. I thought the meeting was going to end up in CA. i was fine with that because it meant it would be on the east coast in 2010. so many people are complaining about it being on one coast or the other, and that it should be in the middle. Well that are some of us that want to go and can't even afford to make it to the middle of the US, so having it on a coast is the only option. if it is in VA this year, then great i'll be there. If its in CA, then i'll just wait till the next year. simple as that.
But now that i'm not paying to vote, i probably won't be able to come anyway if your only allowing paying voters to attend the meeting (not sure if that was mentioned). |
I think there are many who have felt that having a central location would be LESS of an expense/hassle for all -- instead of flying or driving from, let's say, Key West Florida, to, let's say, Hollywood, CA....you only go half way. AND I think (not sure) that is the reasoning for so many thinking having it centrally located will be better for people.
I agree....it was said that if one coast gets more votes over the other...it will be that coast this year and the next coast next year....but I think when there is a pre-determined idea of where it is going to be...that just gets it all confusing to everyone...meaning, it really (and sorry for putting this out there), seems that most were all set on San Diego...and now that so many voted for the other...that is when the pay re-vote came in, etc.
I personally do not care (well, in a way, I guess I do) where it is held...I just hope to be able to attend....and not have all of this nonsense that is happening!