Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnie  Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought we were going to have a poll to see where it should be held. I didn't think were were going to have MANY polls. If we were going to chose the top cities and have another poll, why leave off cities that were suggested in the first place? We could have 10 polls and narrow it down to where the most vocal chose to have it. That is hardly fair to those of us who DO plan to attend and went to GREAT lengths to attend the KC one even thou it in NOWHERE within driving distance of KC. I don't think any of us are rich or have unlimited funds to travel. I just don't understand the concept of having a poll then having another poll if the city that wins isn't the one someone wanted it to be. This is just my own observations and I hope I didn't make anyone mad, but it just doesn't feel right to me. |
I see your point Sonya. My reason for asking is because if the majority of people are choosing are one coast over the other, I think that needs to be taken into consideration. If you have 80 people who will for sure
come if its on the West coast, but only 40 will come for sure on the East Coast - even though the cities are divided then I think we have to take that into consideration. Because what if one city wins
And right now if you add up the votes based on Coasts, there are 70 votes for the East and only 47 for the West, even though currently San Diego is winning overall