Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  I see nothing wrong with this; I suppose it will help them compete with unethical registries such as APRI and CKC that present themselves as an alternative to the AKC. The AKC isn't trying to "trick" or mislead anyone by doing this. That's where I have a problem with other registries. Saying a dog had papers use to mean it was purebred, the "papers" meant something, but other registries will give out "papers" to anyone who pays for them, and this is an attempt to mislead the puplic. |
You are correct. That is a big selling point..stating that the dog has papers. Most of the time you are asked to pay more because of this.
I am just wondering how do you prove that your dog's parents are AKC registered? If let's say the breeder / seller is not reacheable? Just curious. I think that when AKC ever drops it's registry standards...it will all go to the dogs
