Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SoCalyorkiLvr Dr. Blake ( www.the petwhisperer.com) does not believe that altering a pet is necessarily better for it health wise as a lot of vets will argue. He is of the opinion that animals should be left with "all their parts" unless there is some valid reason for taking them away. If it would be impossible to prevent unwanted pregnancies for example, he would recommend spaying, or if a male makes life miserable with his marking idoors, for example. But he says there is no scientific evidence to sugges that spaying and /or neutering is healthier. Sure those dogs will never get testicular or mammary cancer because they do not hve those parts but that is not a reason to remove them from otherwise healthy dogs. I like his logic so since Hefner cam to me neutered and there is no chance of an unwanted pregnancy I am not going to spay them unless they start having false pregnancies or something else makes it advisable.
Just a personal decision I have made. |
ya other ppl have told me thesame.. i just dont know im still on the fence.
JCarlson2004: Just spoke to Nobella and she said the vet didn't remove any of little Coco's baby teeth.
wow... how come?? does the vet think they will come out on their own?