View Single Post
Old 08-25-2005, 12:31 PM   #22
SoCalyorkiLvr
BANNED!
 
SoCalyorkiLvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveMyBaby
what do you mean??
Dr. Blake (www.the petwhisperer.com) does not believe that altering a pet is necessarily better for it health wise as a lot of vets will argue. He is of the opinion that animals should be left with "all their parts" unless there is some valid reason for taking them away. If it would be impossible to prevent unwanted pregnancies for example, he would recommend spaying, or if a male makes life miserable with his marking idoors, for example. But he says there is no scientific evidence to sugges that spaying and /or neutering is healthier. Sure those dogs will never get testicular or mammary cancer because they do not hve those parts but that is not a reason to remove them from otherwise healthy dogs. I like his logic so since Hefner cam to me neutered and there is no chance of an unwanted pregnancy I am not going to spay them unless they start having false pregnancies or something else makes it advisable.

Just a personal decision I have made.
SoCalyorkiLvr is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!