WTH?!?!? This is SOOOO screwed up.
We mentioned this to my acting teacher today. She thinks its the sickest thing she's ever heard. I'm bringing this up here because I asked her if she thought it qualified as art. She said that the universal rule for art, is "Art can be anything as long as it doesn't physically hurt yourself, ANYONE ELSE, or the enviroment." So, in the art world, according to that, this isn't really covered as art because its hurting the dog.
Unfortunatly, that's not written down anywhere as a law so nothing can be done about it. But it just makes me SO angry that this man can get away with it. Why doesn't he take his nack for finding starving dogs, and put it to use rather than torture?
GRRRRRR. This just makes me so angry.