View Single Post
Old 03-26-2008, 08:50 AM   #43
Woogie Man
Donating Member
 
Woogie Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessDiana View Post
While the quality of food is important, I don't think it is of utmost concern. Many dogs are fed absolute junk and many of them lead long, happy, healthy lives. Not many dogs, however, are released prematurely and don't develop problems.

Plus, breeding regulations deal with ethics --- people who feed their dog junk food are still feeding them. JMO.
So, if I'm reading this right, one would be labeled an irresponsible breeder if they release a puppy before 12 weeks but would not if they feed their dogs junk? I just don't don't follow this logic. Chronic kidney disease is the #1 cause of death in dogs (all breeds) and poor quality food is the main contributor to this. Ever hear the expression "you are what you eat"? For the very organizations we look to for guidance in the welfare of our dogs to promote junk food reeks of hypocrisy. They dilute their authority and tarnish the trust placed in them by these actions. JMO
Woogie Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!