03-13-2008, 10:57 AM
|
#11 |
YT 2000 Club Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: IL
Posts: 2,179
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BakersDozen It is my understanding that the requirement to vet check the puppy on the Buyer's end is so that there is proof later that the pup arrived in good condition. This must be done within a reasonably short period of time to be valid, as anything can happen in a few days as far as injury, etc. Not only does this protect the breeder from later claims that the pup arrived injured, sick, etc., I as a Buyer would always want to vet check the pup anyway.
The no refund of $ thing aggravates me as well....some just offer a replacement pup....well, why in the world would I want another pup from the same breeder? I would want my $$ back! Even if I felt it wasn't the breeder's fault, I would still feel I was entitled to my $. | I agree with you regarding wanting a refund rather than a replacement pup.
Sheila |
| |