Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s  Wow, that's an unfair, mistruth if I ever heard one! You can't just assume that because a dog is CKC reg it is poorly bred!  Nor does that mean they aren't good representation of the breed. I have a CKC female who I bred to a dual reg male. I had her evaluated by several 'experts' (show breeders and judges) before even considering breeding her. I did everything I could to make sure she was a 'quality representation' of the breed. So you can't always judge a book by it's cover.
You can get dishonest breeders and poorly bred dogs with ANY registry.
Sorry, but for those who do take the time to go about breeding the right way, comments like that are quite insulting. |
I AGREE - my AKC registered male was unhealthy & his breeder was/is horrible. The male I have now is CKC registered and he is healthy, beautiful & right on track to fit the "breed standard" perfectly. I would rather deal with a good breeder thru CKC than someone like the AKC approved puppymill I had the misfortune of dealing with my first go around!