Quote:
Originally Posted by fannie  I'm just going to give you my honest opinion, and I sincerely do not mean to hurt your feelings! I really don't feel that he should have to give you a puppy out of his daughter's litter. He's probably just selling them for her. I would do the same for one of my own children. However, I DO think that he should be upfront on his website and advertise them as her litter, not his. There really isn't anything "illegal" with doing that.
I promise that I'm not taking his side! I'm just trying to see both sides of things. I do believe that he owes you a puppy, and by all means you should get it. There's just got to be a way that you can send him some sort of document with the right wording to basically scare him enough that he will make things good on his end. Did you keep the puppy on those vitamin supplements? (which, btw, I think is absolutely rediculous!) |
I TOTALLY agree with you. We see things the same way. If it is indeed his "daughters" litter, then he should say so. There is nothing illegal in selling them under his name. I feel though that he is lying and trying to give me the puppy that would go for less, not the replacement of my puppy. When someone I know inquired about that puppy, he gave the info, price and gave his name on the response. If it was his daughter's, shouldn't she have signed the e-mail. It gives me the impression that he is being dishonest and choosing what puppy he will give as a replacement. They have litters all year around?/ seem strange? No, about the supplement, I asked my pup's vet and he said she didn't need that supplement. Did you notice that they require the dog to be on that supplement and try to use it as a way not to pay or replace if pup not on the supplement. They are probably getting a big kickback from the company.