View Single Post
Old 09-19-2007, 05:29 AM   #93
diggy4
Bella Boo & Diggy Too!
Donating GS Member
 
diggy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,156
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklynn View Post
YTCA wrote/writes the standard but AKC has the final approval on all registries! As to the other poster it's not about color but when breeding and owning a purebred dog no matter the breed, as a responsible breeder/owner/potential owner you want the best respensation of whatever breed you choose so you go to that breed standard and try to adhrere to what is written. Breeding to just make money off designer ploys as in using the terms teacup/toy/rare is just not ethical. The reason for this thread is to get a good idea on what would be correct in color for the yorkies and I am only trying to educate. The yorkie standard says the coat is of prime importance in this breed but as I've stated before I believe health, structure, movement for me is the most important and the coat/color is just the icing on the cake! I am not trying to argue LOL
Donna Bird
Brooklynn's Yorkshire Terriers
I've said it before how educating this thread is.....I for one am learnig I really dont want it to be an argument I just wanna know right from wrong and who decides what!

So do I have this right....ANY dog that come from 2 AKC parents (including tri colored and liver colors CAN be registered, but not shown in a show ring?....And AKC is limiting even more colors that is acceptable for show ring, as they can be shown if not steel blue aand tan but are considered to be faulted for color?? I hope I am getting this right lol
__________________
ALL DOGS GO TO HEAVEN
diggy4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!