Quote:
Originally Posted by jp4m2  Just because the FDA approves something in no way does it imply it's safe...the FDA has a terrible track record for approving drugs that where later pulled from the market after killing or injuring people, so just going by their recommendations is unreliable... |
Thanks, B. J. I do understand that many pets have been recovered with the use of this tool. But, I've learned the hard way not to blindly trust anyone - even those in the medical field. One such example that changed our lives was my daughter's reaction to the dpt vaccine. Please,
see here for her story. While most children are unaffected, if it's your child - one is too many.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp4m2 there has to be an unbiased party for reliable info when it comes to doing studies on safety...Quite frequently the people in charge of passing approval have a financial interest in getting these things on the market... |
.........
That's what I'm thinkin'. Like the pharmaceutical companies who clean up on vaccines that should NOT be given to babies whose neurological systems are not even developed yet! Or, the pediatricians who don't question the fillers and binders that go into these vaccines they push into our children; because said doc knows "mom" will be unhappy to see her baby stuck multiple times insead of just the one. How many children are now on daily doses of Ridlan and other drugs to combat ADHD, and ADD? Many researchers are now admitting that these conditions "may be vaccine relate".