[MyFairLacy]

Originally Posted by PuppyLovinNurse

I agree.

HOWEVER, if she's old enough to be taking nude photos of herself, she's old enough to know that it IS going to get out to the public and she's old enough to know that she's a role model for young girls (underage, very young girls) and they don't need to be doing this.

But everyone is a role model to someone. I don't think kids are going to look up to her any less now because of the picture. I mean look at Britney Spears - she became the "sex object" that every mother hated to see their kids idolize. Just because she's an actress in a movie that a lot of young girls watch shouldn't mean she has to live her life to be a perfect role model to these kids. She's just an actress in a movie... Don't kids moreso look up to her character in the movie than the actress herself anyway? And she's not a little girl herself - she's 18 and now an adult. That's the problem with a lot of "teenager" movies. They cast adults in teen/child roles and kids want to be just like them but in reality the actor is like 20-something. I just think it's unfair that just because she's a Disney actor in a popular movie that kids like that she's getting so much flack for the picture (which was supposed to be private anyway).